web statistics

Keefe Commissary Order Form Why Is Keefe Commissary Order Form So Famous?

READER COMMENTS ON”BUSTED: It’s Hard Out Actuality For a (Fake) Rightwing Pimp and Buzz Tapper”(78 Responses so far…)

keefe commissary order form
 keefe commissary price list - keefe commissary order form

keefe commissary price list – keefe commissary order form | keefe commissary order form

COMMENT #1 [Permalink]… Eric Davis said on 1/26/2010 @ 3:42 pm PT…

Brad, I knew you’d be all over this one. It would be such abundant actuality for a Abomination Scene storyline!~e.

COMMENT #2 [Permalink]… Jon in Iowa said on 1/26/2010 @ 3:51 pm PT…

I admiration if Breitbart will alarm for basic punishment.

COMMENT #3 [Permalink]… zapkitty said on 1/26/2010 @ 3:55 pm PT…

And the awe-inspiring affair is this… Landrieu has been a able accessory for the corporations and the right-wing. Didn’t O’Keefe get the memo?

COMMENT #4 [Permalink]… majii said on 1/26/2010 @ 4:00 pm PT…

It accusation be boss awkward for those U.S. Congressmen who active the resolution anniversary O’Keefe for his affected ACORN videos! Ha ha ha ha ha! Karma is actually a b!tch. If any of them were my child, he’d still be in jail. I don’t apprehend Breitbart, Fuchs Noose, or any of the rw radio “entertainers” to accept abundant to say about this incident, except that maybe they haven’t actually done anything. Balloon about the assemblage who saw them at the federal building, balloon what is in the affidavit, balloon aggregate except arresting them and authoritative amaranthine excuses for their behavior. If the accountable comes up on Fuchs Noose, it will anon devolve into a focus on how base Admiral Obama and the liberals are, and how we are antibacterial the country. We didn’t breach into the Watergate building, try to eavesdrop a republican senator’s phone, or draft up a federal architecture like McVeigh, but it doesn’t bulk because liberals/progressives are agitated and corrupt. I apprehend commodity that Charles Johnson said in a LA Times commodity recently, and it has backward in my mind. He said that he never accustomed from any liberal/progressive the afterlife threats, threats of violence, and abhorrence mail that he has accustomed from the conservatives/republicans aback he disagreed with them, alike on the absolute advancing affair of whether GWB was appropriate in advancing Iraq. This says a lot about abounding on the added ancillary of the aisle, not all of them, but actually a few of them.

COMMENT #5 [Permalink]… Brighter than Bart said on 1/26/2010 @ 4:03 pm PT…

All of the conspirators are awful admired bourgeois activists of the Rove variety.

This is aloof an admission ritual.

COMMENT #6 [Permalink]… Pablo de Albuquerque said on 1/26/2010 @ 5:37 pm PT…

Reminds me if Increda-boy from The Incredibles- “and your apparel looks actually ridiculous!” -Bon VoyajeLooks like a Academy Republican aggravating to dress up like a pimp- as we say in NM: “not even”!

COMMENT #7 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 1/26/2010 @ 6:20 pm PT…

So let me get this straight…

-These guys entered a Federal architecture beneath apocryphal pretenses…-They attempted to alter with the buzz arrangement amid in a Federal Building…

I don’t apperceive about anyone else…but I’m abiding that the aloft two facts are Homeland Aegis violations.Shouldn’t these yahoos be headed to Guantanomo for an boring bulk of time and denied any acknowledged representation etc etc…

I beggarly the declared “terrorists” we accept incarerated at Guantanomo accept been accused of abundant less…

COMMENT #8 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/26/2010 @ 6:40 pm PT…

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!

COMMENT #9 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/26/2010 @ 6:43 pm PT…

Maybe Breitbart will arise out with a adventure that Sesame Artery is biased, to run arrest for O’Keefe.

COMMENT #10 [Permalink]… Floridiot said on 1/26/2010 @ 8:45 pm PT…

Are you abiding that isn’t Ann Coulter?…That photo…

COMMENT #11 [Permalink]… Floridiot said on 1/26/2010 @ 8:59 pm PT…

“Stan Dai has ties to CIA”

Good, I was cat-and-mouse for this.

Remember aback Cheney and aggregation was politicizing the DOJ?

Remember aback Cheney and aggregation beatific Porter Goss to the CIA to do “oversight”?

Draw your own abstracts but there is collapsed out abomination activity on actuality IMO.

COMMENT #12 [Permalink]… MsAnnaNOLA said on 1/26/2010 @ 10:33 pm PT…

Wow this is so weird. Keith Olberman and Johnathan Turley say the aboriginal calculation abandoned is account 10 years. Bethink in Federal bastille there is no time off for adequate behavior. Turley additionally postulates that this is aloof the aboriginal charge.

COMMENT #13 [Permalink]… Soul Rebel said on 1/26/2010 @ 11:19 pm PT…

This is hilarious. I’ve been in the sky or in airports best of the day. As anon as I got home and saw this on the MSNBC homepage, I addled appropriate over here, animate that it would be the banderole of the day!

Maybe there is a god….

Nah!

COMMENT #14 [Permalink]… mcthorogood said on 1/26/2010 @ 11:22 pm PT…

COMMENT #15 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/26/2010 @ 11:54 pm PT…

This is such a shock.Everyone knows that if he’d artlessly abutting a accumulation to attenuate the government and austere barrio or commodity controllable like that, he’d get a academy teaching job and barrage advanced presidential campaigns.Tapping a accessible agents buzz aloof pales by comparison, doesn’t it?

COMMENT #16 [Permalink]… Soul Rebel said on 1/27/2010 @ 12:40 am PT…

Oh My God

cue appropriately awful agency music

Did I aloof witness:

Return of the Ayers

Yes, folks, now that the abiding admired CHAPPAQUIDDICK has beat out its final reel, we accompany to you Chicago Citizen of the year, 1997 and adapted agitator William Ayers. You anticipation that adventure was dead, but you were wrong. Sleep with one eye open. Lock your doors and bolt your windows. Stock up on garlic and argent bullets.

Hear William Ayers accomplish abandoned statements, like –

“The Weather Underground went on to booty albatross for agreement several baby bombs in abandoned offices…. We did backpack out allegorical acts of acute abuse directed at monuments to war and racism, and the attacks on property, never on people, were meant to account animal activity and aback abuse and assurance to end the Vietnam war.”

New, in this sequel, watch bourgeois “morans” accomplish majik, sleight-of-mouth, and added illusion, such as the abracadabra of accumulation “Investigations by The New York Times, CNN, and added account organizations assured that Obama does not accept a abutting accord with Ayers” with “if you can abode two bodies in the aforementioned allowance at the aforementioned time, or if you can actualization that they captivated a conversation, or aggregate a cup of coffee…then you accept accustomed that they allotment ideas, policies, outlook, influences, and, especially, albatross for anniversary other’s behavior” and axis it into “launch(ing) advanced campaigns.”

Coming anon to a political amphitheater abreast you.

COMMENT #17 [Permalink]… Floridiot said on 1/27/2010 @ 3:55 am PT…

SR, it’s added like; “Remember aback the “conservatives” installed accumulated political agents in every annex of Government and media buying to run a 24 hour-a-day 7 days-a-week advertising beforehand manipulating the [ignorant articulation of the] electorate adjoin accelerating causes, affective this cuntree arise Fascism at an alarming rate?”…oh wait…

COMMENT #18 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 7:33 am PT…

COMMENT #19 [Permalink]… LarryMo said on 1/27/2010 @ 8:42 am PT…

Since O’Keefe is Breitbart’s EMPLOYEE, aback did he aboriginal apprehend about the arrest?

His non-reply to TPM was forth the curve of “WTF??? Wowser. Shocked.”

Really, Andy?

I abiding achievement that the buzz O’Keefe was filming his co-conspirators with has a buzz log that shows Breitbart was in blow with the N.O. assemblage afore (during?) the crime.

As adequate as this adventure already is, blame it up a cleft and accepting Andy Breitbart into the accusation would be the icing on the cake.

COMMENT #20 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:14 am PT…

Thank you, SR, for those figgy theatrics of how abysmal dissection abnegation can go, alike in the age of the internet and afire fact-checking, aback the barrage of the world’s best important political beforehand is compared to administration a cup of kool-aid.I beggarly coffee.By the way SR, why DID you abutment Teddy afterwards his bashed active resulted in a asleep woman? I can’t delay to see the semantic concoctions on that score.

And I can acquaint Floridiot spent a lot of time with those sources you mentioned, all of which arise to accept a accustomed assemblage to the left, as appreciably few abnormal on google can show, such as this from the UCLA: “Overall, the aloft media outlets are actually moderate… but alike so, there is a assessable and cogent bent in that about all of them angular to the left,” (http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Media-Bias-Is-Real-Finds-UCLA-6664.aspx)Wow! There goes the abstract for THAT cabal theory!

It’s ok though, Flor. Best association are acquainted of it alike if you aren’t: http://www.mediaresearch…g/flash/2008/Oct2008.pdfI’m abiding you’re a acute man aback it comes appropriate bottomward to it, you aloof get agitated abroad in your amorous abhorrence for those who don’t accede with your ideas.

Oh, and congratulations to all the liberals actuality on BO’s abutment of warrantless wiretapping, added troops in Afghanistan, added trillions in debt, and that Gitmo thingy still ample accessible like a burst maw.What a change.

Then again, it’s not as if he’d formed connected abundant in backroom to accord a bright abstraction of what he’d do. Tsk.

COMMENT #21 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:34 am PT…

ravenhairedmaid @20

Do you avert abundant ?

1. Ayers-O’Keefe Isn’t apples and oranges….it’s apples and hamburgers.2. Your tit for tat amphitheater screed…sounds like “I apperceive you are but what am I ?”3. Why aren’t you abashed that O’Keefe acquired admission to a Federal architecture in adjustment to bug an adopted official’s buzz ?I admiration what the Patriot Act and Homeland aegis anticipate of those activities ?…yet you’ll abbreviate and avert them.

You can amble out Teddy Kennedy (dead), Bill Ayers (irrelevent) or Obama’s continutation of W Bush’s actionable behavior all you want…

But you complete like a fasict apologist artlessly gluttonous to change the topic…

COMMENT #22 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:38 am PT…

Re: animadversion 21….

3. Why aren’t you abashed that O’Keefe acquired admission to a Federal architecture in adjustment to bug an adopted official’s buzz ?

Let me add O’Keefe illegally acquired admission to a Federal architecture beneath apocryphal pretenses in adjustment to alter with and bug a blast line…

Sounds like commodity a agitator would do….ya’ anticipate ?

COMMENT #23 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:41 am PT…

I can consistently acquaint aback Brad array a hit…

The rightwing broadcast apparatus goes into kneejerk action.They actualization up spinning wilding, attempting to addled the affair and change the discussion…

It never fails….

COMMENT #24 [Permalink]… colinjames said on 1/27/2010 @ 10:16 am PT…

Did addition footfall in something? There’s a audible aroma of TROLLSH*T advancing from the comments section…

COMMENT #25 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 10:44 am PT…

This is bigger than Christmas!

COMMENT #26 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 10:48 am PT…

Hey, maybe this’ll get better. Maybe Breitbart’s affiliated to it!

COMMENT #27 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 10:50 am PT…

Brad: has Breitbart been “twittering” you on this?

COMMENT #28 [Permalink]… sophia said on 1/27/2010 @ 11:27 am PT…

keefe commissary order form
 keefe commissary price list - keefe commissary order form

keefe commissary price list – keefe commissary order form | keefe commissary order form

It’s agreeable & all & yet Mr. Changehope is about to shoot addition armament into the ancillary of the U.S.S. Amurruka. We’re sunk folks. This dweeb will probly get off light. And we’ll be advantageous for his ambition & cot. Breadth will ) _ be sleeping aback our abode of accompaniment sinks? Ttfn. Time for a nap.

COMMENT #29 [Permalink]… sophia said on 1/27/2010 @ 11:33 am PT…

That aberrant set of characters was meant to be: YOU. As in: breadth will YOU be sleeping aback the abode sinks? I do bethink some added malfeasants who never saw the bastille admission way. This little jailbait ain’t nuthin’. We accusation to booty bottomward bank street, the banks, and authorize about adjourned elections, hand-counted cardboard ballots & accustomed bloom affliction for all. THEN they can’t ascendancy us. Apparently too late, realistically, but as my bud Howard Zinn says-there’s way added of us than there are of them. Hey-bright idea: change your abnegation on your amount (if u still accept a job) and stop lending the accompaniment & admiral YOUR money. We gotta cut off the accumulation so they’ll alpha alert to US again. We accept all the power-in our dollars. They can’t action afterwards it.

COMMENT #30 [Permalink]… Floridiot said on 1/27/2010 @ 12:22 pm PT…

Is anyone abroad besides me ailing and annoyed of so declared conservatives commendation a awry accumulated sponsored UCLA media abode by accumulated paid hacks Groseclose and Milyo?

Sounds like you there, ravenhairedmaid, are the one that needs to do some reading, but alas, you won’t.

COMMENT #31 [Permalink]… Floridiot said on 1/27/2010 @ 12:28 pm PT…

COMMENT #32 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 12:41 pm PT…

Sophia: you’re putting up a apocryphal choice, that we can’t abode on this OR we’re not watching the New Apple Order. We can accumulate our eye on both.

COMMENT #33 [Permalink]… Jon in Iowa said on 1/27/2010 @ 12:50 pm PT…

Actually, Flo, I’m ailing and annoyed of it, too. I’ve additionally had my ample of the piss-poor argumentation in which they accept that alleging a bent is the aforementioned as disproving an analysis (or several, as the case may be). And that’s to say annihilation of the able “someone abroad did commodity bad, so I’m activity to abstain what this guy did” mentality, which has never fabricated faculty to me.

COMMENT #34 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 1:03 pm PT…

COMMENT #35 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 1:22 pm PT…

COMMENT #36 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/27/2010 @ 3:42 pm PT…

And, already again, abnegation is what’s for banquet on the advanced blog.

Don’t the liberals actuality adduce anyone but Soros-funded advertising sites?http://www.politico.com/…s/stories/0408/9514.htmlFlor, pot is calling on band three.

Then again, I accept those are the alone ones that acquaint you association what you appetite to hear.

Jon, you’ve allegedly absent clue of what’s activity on aback you accept to be employing the absolute behavior you condemn, and no one said annihilation about disproving the investigation.

And bluehawk, was that blurb declared to be some array of rebuttal? Because all it did was highlight the audacious affectation in your own logic:You alpha off with an beforehand to abbreviate the drive of the Ayers fiasco, afresh acquaint us what you anticipate of my accent (and, of course, THAT’s appropriate on affair and not deflection, isn’t it?)

You afresh go on to ask why I’m not abashed at the beforehand to bug a accessible agents buzz afterwards cogent us why you aren’t abashed that obama was so bearded as to barrage his beforehand from an apathetic bomber.

As for aspersing or arresting okeefe, amuse actualization us breadth I did so.Because I apperceive you wouldn’t dream of carefully casting apocryphal accusations.Because everybody knows alone fascists do that.

Truth be told, I accept to say that bombing barrio and putting lives at accident and abutting groups to attenuate the government are added agitator activities than borer a accessible agents phone.I acquisition it agreeable that this would accept to be acicular out, abnormally aback you’re appealing abundant calling Okeefe a agitator while ambulatory about Ayers, who aboveboard & on the almanac said he wishes he & his assemblage had austere more. That they didn’t annihilate anyone doesn’t beggarly they didn’t put bodies in crisis of death.

Now, this is not necessarily a aegis of Okeefe (although I apperceive it will be credible as one because, afterwards all, this is a advanced blog breadth readers actually accede media affairs a accustomed antecedent of information), but isn’t every accessible agents buzz & accessories paid for by taxpayers? If so, afresh why wouldn’t we be buried to what it’s acclimated for?

Also, if you appetite to pretend advanced abutment for Kennedy and the downplaying of Ayers’ role doesn’t accent a anguish abridgement of adequate judgment, you’re actually chargeless to.But that doesn’t beggarly I accept to.So, acquaint us why Kennedy’s killing doesn’t bother liberals but Bush’s does? Why does borer a buzz bother you but bombing barrio and adulatory to accept done added doesn’t?

By the way, is SR clumsy to acknowledgment his own questions, or do you anticipate blowing is easier than laying out the base of your behavior with facts? Or do you accept several accounts to accomplish it attending like a agglomeration of bodies accept & say the exact aforementioned thing?And why did you column so abounding abbreviate ones instead of accumulation them? That would accept been abundant added efficient. I’m aloof saying.

Oh, and if the attendance of trolls is the admeasurement of success of a blog, afresh you acutely never appointment the bourgeois ones.

On the final note, we actually accede on something:That obama is continuing bush’s actionable policies.I anticipate the temperature in hell must’ve alone

COMMENT #37 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 1/27/2010 @ 4:34 pm PT…

ravenhairedmaid @36

And bluehawk, was that blurb declared to be some array of rebuttal? Because all it did was highlight the audacious affectation in your own logic:You alpha off with an beforehand to abbreviate the drive of the Ayers fiasco, afresh acquaint us what you anticipate of my accent (and, of course, THAT’s appropriate on affair and not deflection, isn’t it?)

If this were a topic/article about Bill Ayers afresh you would be absolute Raven…Maybe you should go aback and apprehend what the topic/article is about. I didn’t see Ayers mentioned…hence you bringing him up is a angle of the accurate affair here.

You afresh go on to ask why I’m not abashed at the beforehand to bug a accessible agents buzz afterwards cogent us why you aren’t abashed that obama was so bearded as to barrage his beforehand from an apathetic bomber.

Again…Not relevent to the affair at hand…Topic=O’Keefe and Breitbart, not Obama-Ayers.But by your credible politcal adherence we accept why you appetite to circuit this assimilate commodity or addition else.And absolution me for allurement why you would actually abstain an alone accepting admission to a Federal architecture by bamboozlement in adjustment to alter with/bug telephones ? And…Ayers= 40 years agoO’Keefe= yesterdayHell according to you…We should bomb Japan afresh for Pearl Harbor….

Now, this is not necessarily a aegis of Okeefe (although I apperceive it will be credible as one because, afterwards all, this is a advanced blog breadth readers actually accede media affairs a accustomed antecedent of information), but isn’t every accessible agents buzz & accessories paid for by taxpayers? If so, afresh why wouldn’t we be buried to what it’s acclimated for?

What allotment of attempted actionable wiretapping do you not accept ?What allotment of accessing a Federal architecture by bamboozlement in adjustment to accomplish a abomination do you not actually butt ?

Also, if you appetite to pretend advanced abutment for Kennedy and the downplaying of Ayers’ role doesn’t accent a anguish abridgement of adequate judgment, you’re actually chargeless to.But that doesn’t beggarly I accept to.So, acquaint us why Kennedy’s killing doesn’t bother liberals but Bush’s does? Why does borer a buzz bother you but bombing barrio and adulatory to accept done added doesn’t?

Kennedy= dead….although I’m abiding you would be able with digging his body up and prosecuting him column mortem.Ayers= Again..irrelevent….I’m starting to complete repetitive…but that’s how best acquirements is accomplished, by blueprint repetition.

Oh, and if the attendance of trolls is the admeasurement of success of a blog, afresh you acutely never appointment the bourgeois ones.

Admission of your behabior is the aboriginal footfall to healing…I for one do apprehend bourgeois sites…I about accept no acumen to animadversion on those blogs/sites in adjustment to tit for tat agitate or aberration the affair to one added of my liking. It’s a abortive exercise that alone enflames the capacity in this country and abundance fascists. The fascist-oligharchy loves liberals and conservatives angry and agitate anniversary other…it gives them abounding abandon to rob us dark and astringe our rights while we’re distracted.You accept like a fasict distractor agent…

As far as Ayers goes….I grew up with a guy who became one of the bigger biologic lords in Detroit; I acceptance that would disqualify me for any accessible office…Because I knew him.

Your few sentences on O’Keefe and your absolute blank Breitbart told me all I accusation to apperceive about your action actuality at Bradblog.

Your not actuality to accompany light…you alone came to flame.

COMMENT #38 [Permalink]… Jon in Iowa said on 1/27/2010 @ 4:47 pm PT…

Pay accurate attention, class; this is world-class trolling.

COMMENT #39 [Permalink]… Soul Rebel said on 1/27/2010 @ 7:23 pm PT…

By the way, is SR clumsy to acknowledgment his own questions, or do you anticipate blowing is easier than laying out the base of your behavior with facts? Or do you accept several accounts to accomplish it attending like a agglomeration of bodies accept & say the exact aforementioned thing?

Can you point out any catechism that I asked, added than Did I aloof witness…?” I looked aback over what I wrote, and I didn’t acquisition any added question….so – um – breadth was the blowing that I allegedly perpetrated? I mean, really, if what I wrote can be construed as bullying, I anticipate you’ll accusation to acclimate up a little.

But I anticipation trolls had boxy hides. I’m alone demography that on other’s authority, I do try not to get abutting to them myself.

COMMENT #40 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 8:15 pm PT…

ravenhairedmaid @ 20: Poll shows best Americans are acquainted of advanced media bias? Oh, so now a POLL is affidavit that the media is biased? WOW! Aback aback do we POLL bodies with a question: “Are you acquainted of advanced media bias?” How about: “When did you stop assault your wife?”

The catechism is declared a “loaded question”, and you accommodate this as PROOF of advanced media bias?

Here, altercation this:

The Myth of the Advanced Media: The Advertising Model of Account – Noam Chomsky

You did actually what that video says: you “framed” your altercation STARTING with “The media is liberal”…then the catechism is: “Are you acquainted of advanced media bias?”

Instead of the VALID question: “IS the media liberal?”

Not: “Are you AWARE of advanced media bias?”

COMMENT #41 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 8:18 pm PT…

ravenhairedmaid: corporations OWN the media, 5 corporations OWN about all the media in America. So, are you adage corporations are liberal? There is NO PROOF the media is liberal. It’s aloof bodies like YOU and Rush Limbaugh and rightwing media SAYING it is, with ZERO proof. It’s NOT liberal.

COMMENT #42 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/27/2010 @ 8:21 pm PT…

And you articulation to “mediaresearch” as your proof. Media Research is run by huge rightwinger Brent Bozell:

David Brock, the adapted bourgeois noise-maker, on how the Appropriate has sabotaged journalism, democracy, and truth.

As a adolescent announcer in the 1990s, David Brock was a key cog the Republican babble machine. Writing for the American Spectator, a bourgeois annual adjourned by billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, Brock acquired acclaim for his beforehand pieces on Anita Hill and Admiral Bill Clinton. Then, in 2002, Brock came clean. In his memoir, Blinded by the Right, Brock accustomed that his assignment was based on lies and distortion, and allotment of a accommodating apply beforehand adjourned by affluent appropriate addition groups to discredit Clinton and abash the public.

Since then, Brock has connected to betrayal the bourgeois media onslaught. In his newest book, The Republican Babble Machine, Brock abstracts how bourgeois groups burden the media and beforehand misinformation to the public. It’s accessible to see how this is done.

Fringe conspiracies and belief will be kept animate by outlets like Rush Limbaugh, the Washington Times, and the Drudge Report, until they assuredly breach into the boilerplate media.

Media groups like Brent Bozell’s Media Research Center accept spent 30 years adequate the accessible that the media is, in fact, liberal. As Brock says, it’s all a sham: “I accept seen, and I apperceive firsthand, actually from my own pen, how the organized Appropriate has sabotaged not alone journalism but additionally capitalism and truth.”

http://www.motherjones.c…republican-noise-machine

That’s a JOKE bond to Brent Bozell’s Media Research Center as your “proof” that the media is liberal. That’s like bond to Rush Limbaugh!

COMMENT #43 [Permalink]… Soul Rebel said on 1/27/2010 @ 8:37 pm PT…

Great job, Big Dan. Still abashed about breadth she anticipation the blowing was…

COMMENT #44 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/27/2010 @ 8:45 pm PT…

Blue, I’m apologetic about the apparition of my motivations, but the affair at duke is actually the hypocritical acknowledgment of the liberals actuality to the Okeefe adventure aback you were alone too acquisitive to block the Ayers escapade from your minds.

I apprehend you abjure this–and with a all-over accusatory tirade, gasp–but that’s been bent as the absence setting.

May I ask why you abide answering why Ayers bombing things and assuming no affliction in 2001 (which, I should point out, is a little beneath than 40 years ago) doesn’t bother you, but allegedly borer a buzz does?

What allotment of “reckless endangerment” don’t YOU understand?What breadth of “domestic terrorism” are YOU not actually grasping?.Let’s see if you accede with this statement: If Okeefe was a liberal, it’s absolute adequate you’d be actuality arresting &/or acknowledgment him the way you alibi the Wingnut Avaricious Supreme, Bill Ayers.

That Kennedy is now asleep doesn’t beggarly you didn’t abutment his deadly, bashed agglomeration in office, which is accordant to the affectation here:Liberals arise agreeable with Kennedy’s killing, and Kerry’s, and conceivably anyone else’s as connected as they’re on their ancillary of the brainy fence, but afresh apprehend bodies to accept you’re affronted at buzz tapping?You aloof VOTED for a guy who supports borer the phones, remember? (Oh, and you ability appetite to booty a attending at an amend commodity on Okeefe: http://hotair.com/archiv…t-a-case-of-wiretapping/)

So, why would you apprehend conservatives to be affronted at declared buzz curtains aback you’re not affronted at certified avaricious bombings?

By the way, did you associate and barrage your political beforehand from your adolescence friend’s home? Did you coact on allotment with him and did he advice get you a bench on a academy ameliorate board?No?

Then, gee whiz, your bash at affinity is all farked up.

Ta!

COMMENT #45 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:03 pm PT…

SR, you didn’t see my questions addressed to you? I’m so sorry. You know, I should accept accustomed that you’re calmly confused.

COMMENT #46 [Permalink]… Soul Rebel said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:09 pm PT…

You apperceive what this reminds me of…

8 years of blaming the Bush recession, the Bush intelligence failures, the Bush (insert political/social beating here)

…on Clinton.

This O’Keefe affair is HERE and NOW, and cipher on this blog excused, condoned, or contrarily accustomed or accurate what happened with Kennedy or Ayers. What they did socially or politically aback then, that may be a altered story, and it could be able-bodied argued that both of them atoned for their sins.

You are authoritative a harbinger man altercation of affectation to yourself disregard the accustomed bent accomplishments of this man O’Keefe. Adequately hypocritical of YOU wouldn’t you say.

Cheerio, mate!

COMMENT #47 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:17 pm PT…

Let me get this straight:Dan is aggravating to brushoff media affairs as a advanced advertising armpit by announcement a accusation fabricated by addition advanced advertising armpit that the MRC is a bourgeois advertising site.Which allotment of that are you cerebration is persuasive, Dan?

And Dan wants us all to barrage Noam Chomsky as the Ultimate Ascendancy on media bias, admitting the actuality that alike wikipedia cites several sources agitation his claims. Aback I apperceive you can’t be agitated to seek aloft what the Soros-fundies augment you, actuality it is:”A poll of adequate 2008 United States presidential acclamation voters arise on March 14, 2007 by Zogby International letters that 83 percent of those surveyed accept that there is a bent in the media, with 64 percent of respondents of the appraisal that this bent favors liberals and 28 percent of respondents assertive that this bent is conservative.[59] In August 2008 the Washington Column ombudsman wrote that the Column had arise about three times as abounding folio 1 belief about Barack Obama than it had about John McCain aback Obama won the Democratic affair best that June.[60] In September 2008 a Rasmussen poll begin that 68 percent of voters accept that “most reporters try to advice the applicant they appetite to win.” Forty-nine (49) percent of respondents declared that the reporters are allowance Barack Obama to get elected, while alone 14 percent said the aforementioned apropos John McCain. A added 51 percent said that the columnist was actively “trying to hurt” Republican Vice Presidential appointee Sarah Palin with abrogating coverage.[61] In October 2008, The Washington Column media contributor Howard Kurtz arise that Sarah Palin was afresh on the awning of Newsweek, “but with the best biased beforehand banderole I’ve anytime seen.”[62]

After the acclamation was over, the Washington Column ombudsman Deborah Howell advised the Post’s advantage and assured that it was agee in favor of Obama.[63]”

And Dan now takes issues with POLLS.Dan, did you abolish acclamation aback obama was advanced of mccain in them?Just wondering.

COMMENT #48 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:34 pm PT…

Dan, accept you anytime heard of accustomed electric? Conceivably you should attending up whether or not they’re a corporation. Maybe what you acquisition will allude to what media they ownJust a thought.

COMMENT #49 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:36 pm PT…

SR,

Oh please. There’s been annihilation but claims that Ayers has adapted (prove it), abnegation that he is relevant, and incorrect statements apropos timeline and access to obama.

Have you credible anyone accidentally suggesting that bombing buildings, aggravating to attenuate the government, and risking the lives and limbs of innocent people?No.Yet these aforementioned bodies arise accessible to bake Okeefe in amount for an declared wiretap.

By the way, would you amuse point out for us breadth I’ve condoned Okeefe’s declared actions?I apperceive you wouldn’t appetite to carefully disparage.

COMMENT #50 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:45 pm PT…

Beg pardon, that book should accept apprehend “Have you credible anyone accidentally suggesting that bombing buildings, aggravating to attenuate the government, and risking the lives and limbs of innocent bodies WAS WRONG.”

The answer, sadly, is still “no” though.

COMMENT #51 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/27/2010 @ 9:55 pm PT…

COMMENT #52 [Permalink]… Soul Rebel said on 1/27/2010 @ 11:31 pm PT…

RHM (I feel that we accept acheived a akin of familiarity, we are at atomic acquaintances now on some level, but if anyone in the approaching tries to tie you to me, either in babble or deed, be assured that I will abetment you in allegedly abstinent everything)

From #15

Tapping a accessible agents buzz aloof pales by comparison, doesn’t it?

Perhaps I’m demography a absolute advanced analogue (been accustomed to happen) of the babble ‘tacit’, but I affected that your account was tacit approval of O’Keefe’s actions, at absolute atomic in the faculty that “nothing happened to Ayers so annihilation should arise to O’Keefe.”

You accept to admit, if there’s a band there, it’s absolute fine.

And my statements about Ayers or Kennedy are actually not approval, they are artlessly that the situations are past. Way past.

O’Keefe is present.

COMMENT #53 [Permalink]… HankyDubz said on 1/28/2010 @ 2:52 am PT…

So lets see If I am account RHM correctly.

Tapping the phones of a US agent is adequate because…wait for it…Bill Ayers.

Surely you accusation be able to accept on some akin how amusing this altercation is.

COMMENT #54 [Permalink]… Soul Rebel said on 1/28/2010 @ 6:14 am PT…

By the way, RHM, re #49

Yet these aforementioned bodies arise accessible to bake Okeefe in amount for an declared wiretap.

You mean, like this?

COMMENT #55 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/28/2010 @ 6:16 am PT…

ravenhairedmaid : you appetite to analyze Ayers to O’Keefe.

How about, let’s analyze Ted Kennedy to Bush. You cackle about ONE actuality dying at Chappaquiddick. How about the MILLION Iraqi civilians asleep in Iraq because of Bush’s war of lies? Any comments on that?

With Ayers, who was adage there was no abuse at Ayers’ bombings? That happened a connected continued time ago, like Chapaquiddick. So, you accept to accompany up things from connected ago for your comparisions, instead of RIGHT NOW what O’Keefe did and the Iraq War?

If Brad Blog was about connected continued ago aback Ayers was bombing things, maybe Brad Blog would’ve apparent outrage. You’re adage we should actualization abuse RIGHT NOW about Ayers in some crazy allegory to what O’Keefe is accomplishing NOW. That’s declared aberration and you aren’t acclamation O’Keefe. You’re arresting O’Keefe by bringing up things for allegory from decades ago. Sounds like you accept no aegis to me.

What Democratic accessible is bugging phones RIGHT NOW? None. You accept a anemic altercation accepting to accompany up Bill Ayers as a distraction. Anyone can do that, accompany up commodity from the accomplished as a distraction/comparison instead of acclamation the issue. The affair isn’t, as you’re aggravating to accomplish it, comparing Bill Ayers to James O’Keefe. You MADE IT the affair so you don’t accept to anon abode O’Keefe (and Breitbart).

COMMENT #56 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/28/2010 @ 6:21 am PT…

RHM: did you anticipate George W. Bush was a abundant president? I’m aloof wondering. Do you accept to Rush Limbaugh? He and his rightwing media are the ones who brought up Bill Ayers in the aboriginal abode during the presidential campaign. No one anytime heard of Bill Ayers. They dug it up as fodder for the presidential campaign. No one would apperceive who he is appropriate now otherwise.

You bringing up Bill Ayers (and Chappaquiddick) tells me you accept to Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, FOX “news”, and you admired George W. Bush and you’re a Republican. Adequate guess?

COMMENT #57 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 1/28/2010 @ 6:58 am PT…

Ravenhairedmaiden is a broadcast authentic and simple…

She has accomplished her objective…she’s hijacked the affair cilia and fabricated it bugged from it’s original.

She could affliction beneath about her affected altercation about Ayers or Kennedy…She has accomplished her aim of confusing and deflecting from the bulk at hand.She’s not a alteration nut…she’s a rightwing accessible who could affliction beneath about truth. She artlessly wants to do the assignment the job her absolutist administration assigned to her…troll bradblog.

Jon in Iowa @38 said it well..we accept a able broadcast actuality in RHM. Watch and learn.

The best acumen now would be to artlessly abstain her.

COMMENT #58 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 1/28/2010 @ 7:01 am PT…

Ravenhairedmaiden has taken the account affair of O’Keefe’s felonies and Breitbart’s complicitness and put Ted Kennedy and Bill Ayers on trial…

A archetypal rightwingnut tactic.

COMMENT #59 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/29/2010 @ 1:36 am PT…

SR,

I’m abiding you apperceive the singsong about assumptions, so I won’t reiterate it.

Maybe I didn’t accomplish myself clear, but my point is not approval or aegis of Okeefe–and, by the way, let’s bethink that the accusation of buzz borer at this point are aloof that: Allegations. And yes, I would say the aforementioned if it was a advanced democrat–but that bombing barrio (something accurately accurate and not declared in this case) seems to accept been accustomed a chargeless canyon by liberals who are now up in accoutrements about declared wiretapping of phones.

And while I aboveboard do acknowledge the accomplishment you took to column a link, I acknowledge I saw no afire effigies in the account the articulation took me to. You know, like this, and actuality (scroll bottomward on that one).

Know why there weren’t any afire effigies in that picture? Click Here.

Would that advanced backfire had been as effective.

COMMENT #60 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/29/2010 @ 2:02 am PT…

Dan,

Why accept you affected that I disregard Bush’s accomplishments in Iraq?Which brings us aback to you: Why would you–or any liberals–support Kennedy afterwards his actions?”It was a connected time ago” seems to be adequate abundant for you to alibi any behavior as connected as it’s committed by a liberal. Do you anticipate you would accept such an attitude if it wasn’t? If not, how do you absolve accepting a bifold standard?

Why are you absolute that the allegations adjoin Okeefe are true? That hasn’t been accurate yet.

Who’s adage there’s no abuse over the Ayers bombings? Ok, afresh breadth is it? Actualization me some. I’d LOVE to see some advanced abuse at the baroque affair in their own bosom instead of acting like it’s all in the added guy’s camp.

And don’t booty this the amiss way, but I don’t accept you accept abundant aegis approval to accomplish a alarm on what the Democratic agents are or are not doing. There accusation be SOME acumen obama supports wiretapping, right?

Again, I brought up Ayers not as a distraction, but to highlight what appears to be a blog assimilation in hypocrisy.I googled bradblog and Ayers, not already did I acquisition accusation of his accomplishments amid advanced posts. The allegory is not amid Ayers and Okeefe, but the advanced acknowledgment to each.

If I’m mistaken, fine. Prove it.

COMMENT #61 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/29/2010 @ 2:39 am PT…

PS:

Dan, YOU apperceive who Ayers is. Does that beggarly you accept to Rush, OReilly, Fox, etc? I assignment 3rd shift, so my agenda doesn’t actually theirs. You pay for cable? Wow. I consistently admiration who has that abundant time to watch television?But I can actually amount out that politicians are crooks, and not to duke over any added of my money and rights to them no bulk how all-important they try to accomplish it accept all by myself. Seems adequately obvious.

Do you actually anticipate that ablution the presidential beforehand from Ayers house–after a 20 year associate with him, alive with him to adjudge which anti-American apprenticeship groups to fund, and afterwards Ayers helped get a job on a academy ameliorate lath on which they served for 3 years–is insignificant?Why?

I additionally acerb beforehand you google “Bill Ayers” and “25 actor Americans” and see what comes up.

Oh hell, who am I kidding? Here:http://zombietime.com/prairie_fire/

Violent excerpts from Ayers’ book, a agenda of his associations with obama, and video advantage of the slavering nuttiness of Ayers & his associate are all included.Enjoy.

COMMENT #62 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/29/2010 @ 2:53 am PT…

Blue,

And actuality I anticipation it was the TROLLS who did the absurd namecalling. Acceptance I hit a nerve.

Surely you don’t seek to abridge anyone who has a anticipation or abstraction adulterine by you? Because anybody knows alone fascists do that.

Have you anytime heard of “groupthink”, Blue? Here’s wiki’s definition:

“Groupthink is a blazon of anticipation apparent by accumulation associates who try to abbreviate battle and ability accord afterwards alarmingly testing, analyzing, and evaluating ideas. Alone creativity, uniqueness, and absolute cerebration are absent in the following of accumulation cohesiveness, as are the advantages of reasonable antithesis in best and anticipation that ability commonly be acquired by authoritative decisions as a group.[1] During groupthink, associates of the accumulation abstain announcement viewpoints alfresco the abundance area of accord thinking. A array of motives for this may abide such as a admiration to abstain actuality credible as foolish, or a admiration to abstain awkward or angering added associates of the group. Groupthink may account groups to accomplish hasty, aberrant decisions, breadth alone doubts are set aside, for abhorrence of abashing the group’s balance.”

Gosh, looks like commodity to be avoided, doesn’t it? It additionally looks like there’s a able case of it here.

Did you apperceive that groupthink is anticipation to be what led to the Iraq WMD assessment, which–as you know–was apparently the greatest absolute agency for advancing Iraq?

“Now I can assuredly sayThat I’m abashed that you’ve becomeEverything that you had hated …”

COMMENT #63 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 1/29/2010 @ 6:55 am PT…

RHM @62

Look aback to my comments actuality lady….I declared no one names; I did about alarm you what you actually are; a troll. That’s not an epithet, it’s a description.

You took the time to wiki the appellation “groupthink”that’s cute…

The appellation of this commodity and affair cilia is…

By Brad Friedman on 1/26/2010 2:27PMBUSTED: It’s Hard Out Actuality For a (Fake) Rightwing Pimp and Buzz TapperBreitbart’s anti-ACORN activist/videographer arrested with U.S. Attorney’s son, two others, attempting to bug U.S. Senator’s office…

And you arise actuality to accomplish a babble about…who ?Bill AyersSeems you got corraled into GOP/Tea party/RightWing groupthink and can’t acquisition your way out.

If you had arise actuality with some aegis of O’Keefe and Breitbart it would at atomic be on affair and reasonable for the affair at hand.But you came to change the focus to Ayers and Ted Kennedy. Appropriately my broadcast description for you…

Wiki analogue of a troll

In Internet slang, a broadcast is addition who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic letters in an online community, such as an online altercation forum, babble allowance or blog, with the primary absorbed of afflictive added users into an affecting response[1] or of contrarily abolition accustomed on-topic discussion.[2]

Mirrors can be candid or infuriating…

COMMENT #64 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 1/29/2010 @ 8:13 am PT…

With O’Keefe arrest, Breitbart develops newfound acknowledgment for “facts”January 27, 2010 11:23 am ET by Simon Maloy

An excerpt…

Not a adequate day for Andrew Breitbart.

As his hand-groomed protégé, clandestine ACORN video auteur James O’Keefe, sat in a Louisiana badge base beneath arrest for attempting to alter with a U.S. senator’s blast system, Breitbart’s media authority went into lockdown, arising alone a abrupt account abstinent any ability of O’Keefe’s activities. This morning, however, Breitbart broke the silence, announcement a cannonball to BigGovernment.com announcement that he, Andrew Breitbart, was activity to “[w]ait until the facts are in” afore “jumping to conclusions” like Media Affairs and anybody abroad in the media.

Imagine that — Andrew Breitbart chastising the apple for casual acumen afore the facts are in.

Sort of like aback Breitbart acclimated O’Keefe’s deceptively edited videos to affair ample condemnations of ACORN’s alertness to aid in adolescent prostitution, alike admitting afterwards investigations begin that ACORN had done annihilation to breach the law or accommodation for federal funding.

Or like aback BigGovernment.com attacked the White House for arena host to ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis, alone to acquisition out afterwards that it was a altered Bertha Lewis.

Or like aback Breitbart formed with a clandestine detective who abiding through ACORN’s trash, and afresh told the apple that ACORN had conducted a “document dump” in beforehand of an investigation, alike admitting the “documents” angry out to be mainly fliers and old newsletters.

COMMENT #65 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/29/2010 @ 8:35 am PT…

COMMENT #66 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/29/2010 @ 8:42 am PT…

RHM says: don’t allocution about O’Keefe’s breaking the law…because Bill Ayers was a “terrorist”, or James O’Keefe’s bent acts shouldn’t be talked about because Bill Ayers is a “terrorist” and his bent acts were worse, or…actually, what IS your point of always talking about Bill Ayers in advertence to James O’Keefe?

Or are you adage that James O’Keefe is aloof as bad as Bill Ayers?

Or are you adage that Bill Ayers is WORSE…so you can’t allocution about James O’Keefe?

COMMENT #67 [Permalink]… Soul Rebel said on 1/29/2010 @ 5:38 pm PT…

RHM said:

I’m abiding you apperceive the singsong about assumptions, so I won’t reiterate it.

You aloof did. And I advancing it. It was not an absurd acceptance on my part.

bombing barrio (something accurately accurate and not declared in this case) seems to accept been accustomed a chargeless canyon by liberals

Which liberals gave him a chargeless pass? Not me. Fail.

The actuality that the TeaBaggers concluded up not afire Pelosi in amount due to some backfire affairs not. They actually accept their absorbed to accept done so, and anticipation it was a adequate idea, and bewail the actuality that the accessible had not accustomed their purpose in the burning.

Personally, I don’t affliction who is austere in effigy. It’s symbolic, and no I don’t anticipate it’s a de facto beforehand to absolute violence. I’ve got no botheration with afire Bush and Cheney in effigy. You acclimated the appellation “burning in effigy” to accredit to some advanced architecture on O’Keefe. An exaggeration to say the least. That’s the alone acumen I affiliated the article.

COMMENT #68 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/29/2010 @ 8:21 pm PT…

COMMENT #60 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 1/29/2010 @ 2:02 am PT…

Dan,

Why accept you affected that I disregard Bush’s accomplishments in Iraq?

Ummm…because you apparently DO??? You didn’t say you didn’t disregard Bush’s accomplishments in your answer, you aloof asked why I accept it.

Well, do you? And do you accept to Rush Limbaugh? You didn’t acknowledgment the questions, which array of DOES acknowledgment the questions.

I’ll accept you admired Bush and accept to Rush Limbaugh…until you accompaniment otherwise.

COMMENT #69 [Permalink]… Big Dan said on 1/29/2010 @ 8:27 pm PT…

Ravenhead wants abuse apparent about Bill Ayers a few decades ago…but not about a actor asleep in Iraq accident appropriate now acknowledgment to George W. Bush’s lies.

COMMENT #70 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 2/1/2010 @ 10:53 pm PT…

Hi guys,

Sorry, I apperceive you absent me but, you know, it was the weekend and all.

What a abundant job you’re accomplishing of blank me, blue. I anticipate I apprehend Alannis Morrissette is bustling commodity …

I’m sorry, but let’s analysis contempo events:I acquaint an extract from wiki.Then you acquaint an extract from wiki.I don’t apperceive which administration you anticipate the mirror is acicular in, my friend, but I DO apperceive apery is the sincerest anatomy of adulation

And I see that Soros-funded advertising sites are still your modus operandi, but speaking “passing acumen afore the facts are in,” actuality are some links to the retractions issued apropos this adventure from CBS, The Washington Post, and alike the government (since it can apparently be cautiously affected that you won’t get them from media matters)http://patterico.com/201…ust-one-er-two-problems/

http://patterico.com/201…retap-attempt-by-okeefe/

Enjoy.

Dan,Your affirmation that WaPo is a bourgeois rag is absolute to shreds aback they aloof issued two–see links aloft & calculation ’em, two–corrections on the Okeefe story.I don’t apperceive if you’ve noticed, but I’ve fabricated it bright that alike risking animal assurance is detestable, so how you’ve managed to bastardize that into accustomed abutment for Bush’s war is aloft me. Also, what allotment of “I assignment third shift” should I explain further? Are Rush, O’Reilly etc. on in the average of the night? Please, affix the dots yourself. I’m abiding you’re capable, you’ve aloof become too abased on ‘progressive’ sites claiming to do it for you. (By the way, do you not see the affectation of accusing me of alert to Rush, etc. while you subscribe to thinkprogress? Aloof wondering.)

Dan & SR,For the 3rd, 4th or 5th time–frankly, I’ve absent calculation by now–I will recapitulate that my point is the affectation (at least, the actualization of hypocrisy) of the liberals as far as their alertness to let Ayers accelerate while they abuse Okeefe. And already afresh I will accompaniment that I googled bradblog and begin no liberals animadversion accusatory Ayers at all, while there are affluence to be had of Okeefe, which gives the consequence that about broke behavior is accustomed by liberals as connected as they’re committed by adolescent lefties.

And SR, I advancing you adage afire effigies doesn’t bulk to you afterwards you affiliated to an commodity that did not abutment what you were saying. However, I acknowledge the basis and that you don’t get afraid up on that stuff. Every accumulation has its binding elements that can’t be calmly ousted.

Peace!

COMMENT #71 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 2/2/2010 @ 9:58 am PT…

RHM @70

I distincly heard a rim attempt with your aftermost post…

pure comedy…

Not one babble apropos to the affair of the thread…By the way there are several added O’Keefe-Breitbart accoutrement open…and you’re acutely absent from those…

interesting…

Have a nice time deflecting here….

COMMENT #72 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 2/2/2010 @ 2:09 pm PT…

RHM @ 70:

Dan,Your affirmation that WaPo is a bourgeois rag is absolute to shreds aback they aloof issued two–see links aloft & calculation ’em, two–corrections on the Okeefe story.

Good point. Bourgeois rags don’t affair corrections, no bulk how amiss they get the story.

Still, if you’re not accustomed with the right-leaning bent now, sadly, at the once-great WaPo afresh you’re either artlessly not advantageous attention, or you absorb too abundant time account con-man sites like Breitbart’s and watching affected account like at Fox. Your loss. Ours too, aback we accept to alive in the aforementioned country with so abounding of you who accept been played for complete dupes.

COMMENT #73 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 2/4/2010 @ 12:51 am PT…

Is that you blank me again, blue? Because you blot at it

I apprehend that you’re asleep set in your abnegation that affectation is a affair here. That’s ok, because I’m aloof as asleep set that it is.

Why am I not on the added accessible threads? Able-bodied are sources actuality cited that haven’t been debunked or adjourned by George Soros? No? Afresh what for, aback I accept all that actuality with you

COMMENT #74 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 2/4/2010 @ 1:17 am PT…

Way to go, Bradster, you contradicted yourself in your own post.

Since I don’t accept crayons or feel puppets handy, you’ll accept to try to chase forth as best you can:

Your claim:”Right-wing rags don’t affair corrections”

Then the contradiction:”[I]f you’re not accustomed with the right-leaning bent now, sadly, at the once-great WaPo afresh you’re either artlessly not advantageous attention.”

Um, which is it?I’m abiding the acknowledgment is in there somewhere, because you wouldn’t stoop to actuality a liar, right?

By the way, amuse booty a ankle at this and see if it doesn’t authorize as a alteration over at Fox News:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_pscalq-5cI anticipation I’d bigger acquaint you about it, or you’d abide to canyon forth incorrect advice to your readers.

As for “we accept to alive in the aforementioned country with so abounding of you who accept actuality played for complete dupes,”how abounding beforehand promises has obama burst by now?Is Gitmo closed?Isn’t the aftermost Bush arrears about quadrupled by now?What Iraq behavior accept been displaced?How abounding troops are now in Afghanistan?

So, basically, everything’s the same, except now awfully added big-ticket and with several approaching ancestors mired in debt?

Oh, yeah, I actually see what you beggarly

COMMENT #75 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 2/4/2010 @ 9:06 am PT…

Still hammerin’ that bank of benightedness huh RHM ?

Here’s a hint….go get a hammer…pounding your arch adjoin the bank you accompany it down…

hope that helps…

COMMENT #76 [Permalink]… ravenhairedmaid said on 2/4/2010 @ 10:05 pm PT…

Still “ignoring” me, blue, huh?Yep, I can see you accept actually no agitation with affectation

COMMENT #77 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 2/5/2010 @ 9:26 am PT…

RMH

check out this link….

It makes no faculty you ambuscade out on a asleep thread….

[ed note: They’re assigned assertive accoutrement BH and as connected as you augment them, they accumulate at it. —99]

COMMENT #78 [Permalink]… BlueHawk said on 2/5/2010 @ 1:18 pm PT…

Point taken 99

I’m aloof accepting some bliss with our broadcast friend…

I will dearth her now….

Keefe Commissary Order Form Why Is Keefe Commissary Order Form So Famous? – keefe commissary order form
| Pleasant for you to the weblog, in this particular moment I will demonstrate with regards to keyword. And from now on, this is the primary impression: